![]() His information was corroborated by a second confidential source ("CS-2") as well as by recorded conversations. B at 18.) CS-1 has proven to be reliable. B at 18.) CS-1 personally conducted four such deliveries. CS-1 thereafter began cooperating with the DEA and provided information stating that, between 20, CS-1 arranged nine separate cash deliveries totaling over $4,000,000 to an individual named "Izzy" at 449 20 Street, Brooklyn, New York. In or around December 2010, law enforcement agents executed two search warrants at two separate locations in Connecticut that resulted in the seizure of over 300 marijuana plants and the arrest of a confidential source ("CS-1"). B.) The Enders Affidavit made the following factual representations. § 2518, a Special Agent with the Drug Enforcement Administration (the "DEA"), which was sworn to on Mabefore Judge Rakoff. Enders (the "Enders Affidavit") pursuant to 18 U.S.C. To obtain a court order authorizing the interception of wire communications over cellphone number (347) 331-7700 (the "Target Cellphone"), the Government submitted the Affidavit of James J. 154 (1978) is required and that the Government's alleged failure to minimize non-pertinent calls was so pervasive that it requires the suppression of all intercepted calls. In moving to suppress the wiretapped recordings, the defendant argues that the Government lacked probable cause to justify the original wiretap that an evidentiary hearing pursuant to Franks v. ![]() 62.) Accordingly, only the motion to suppress the recordings obtained from the wiretap remain at issue. However, by stipulation endorsed on April 7, 2017, the Government agreed to forego using in its case-in-chief at trial any evidence obtained from the search and seizure of this cellphone and the parties agreed to further limitations on the use of evidence derived from such seizure. The defendant had also moved to suppress the defendant's post-arrest statements identifying the passcode to his cellphone and all evidence subsequently seized from that phone or evidence derived from such seizure. The defendant has moved to suppress recordings obtained pursuant to a court-authorized federal wiretap of the defendant's cellphone. § 1956(h) and three substantive counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. The defendant, Joseph Ezriel Stern, is charged in an indictment with one count of conspiring to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |